Talk:ND-06.015

I have left two different styles for TOC. Which should we use? I think the preformatted has a better look and the numbering scheme is better as the capters in the manuals are numbered in that way. Gandalf 00:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

I think a (over) usage of "pre" is bad, since you can't do links or templates within. On the other hand I agree that it looks good. One idea is to remove the CSS stuff from the "pre" tag and use the Template:DocDescr for graphical layout. HTML in the documents is something we should avoid. Mike 14:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

I agree that the biggest drawback is no links and other stuff when you use "pre" but I haven't managed to find a good enough alternative yet. I have tried the Template:DocDescr but I keep coming back to the same problem, unreadable bullet lists or using "pre" inside the template. Usage of "pre" is Q&D (tm) and the style gives a feeling for how the manuals are written too. I try to avoid it as much as possible but I have spent hours on formatting text without accomplish anything. Mike, you are the guru, show us how it should be done by formatting a third copy of the index the right way and then we could compare and vote.Gandalf 17:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't have any good solution for the moment, but I'll think something out. Mike 23:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Text should not be formatted by hand, it comes from the wysiwyg world. All formatting in my view should be done through templates of some form. Roger 10:32, 29 October 2008 (WDT)