Talk:NLZ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I'm changing the "the ND-110 can have a 48-bit floating CPU.." to "the ND-1x0..". All ND-100 systems could be delivered with 48-bit floating point support, this is not ND-110 specific. The...) |
m (Update) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm changing the "the ND-110 can have a 48-bit floating CPU.." to "the ND-1x0..". All ND-100 systems could be delivered with 48-bit floating point support, this is not ND-110 specific. The Nord-10 had 48-bit floating point, and 48-bit floating point was the standard configuration. 32-bit floating point was a customer option and less common than 48-bit floating point for 16-bit Norsk Data computers. [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 10:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC) | I'm changing the "the ND-110 can have a 48-bit floating CPU.." to "the ND-1x0..". All ND-100 systems could be delivered with 48-bit floating point support, this is not ND-110 specific. The Nord-10 had 48-bit floating point, and 48-bit floating point was the standard configuration. 32-bit floating point was a customer option and less common than 48-bit floating point for 16-bit Norsk Data computers. [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 10:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
: Actually I'm rephrasing the article somewhat. The original description was kind of mixing 32-bit and 48-bit, in that even though it appeared to describe 32-bit FP it still had 'Affected: T A and D'. [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 10:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:32, 29 July 2009
I'm changing the "the ND-110 can have a 48-bit floating CPU.." to "the ND-1x0..". All ND-100 systems could be delivered with 48-bit floating point support, this is not ND-110 specific. The Nord-10 had 48-bit floating point, and 48-bit floating point was the standard configuration. 32-bit floating point was a customer option and less common than 48-bit floating point for 16-bit Norsk Data computers. TArntsen 10:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually I'm rephrasing the article somewhat. The original description was kind of mixing 32-bit and 48-bit, in that even though it appeared to describe 32-bit FP it still had 'Affected: T A and D'. TArntsen 10:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)