Talk:BACKUP-SYSTEM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Floppies (backup) - different format?: new section) |
(Re: Floppies (backup) - different format?) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So I have a lot of floppies which are labeled "backup" and are in sets (1 - n), but they are not normal ND filesystem floppies, and not backup-system volume format. Any idea what kind of format they are, and where it might be documented? Unfortunately, I don't know which tool was used to make the backup. [[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo|talk]]) 11:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC) | So I have a lot of floppies which are labeled "backup" and are in sets (1 - n), but they are not normal ND filesystem floppies, and not backup-system volume format. Any idea what kind of format they are, and where it might be documented? Unfortunately, I don't know which tool was used to make the backup. [[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo|talk]]) 11:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
:There's a faint bell ringing, but I'm not sure. I could take a look at images if you wish. --[[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen|talk]]) 11:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:52, 19 May 2020
Nice! It's good to see this documented. I wrote a Unix tool to read backup-system format CCTs back in 1998, specifically for IRIX on an SGI system I used for reading my old ND backup CCTs. I'll read through the description to see if it all matches what I did, or not.. a quick check looks very familiar. Thanks for adding the page. -- TArntsen (talk) 11:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Floppies (backup) - different format?
So I have a lot of floppies which are labeled "backup" and are in sets (1 - n), but they are not normal ND filesystem floppies, and not backup-system volume format. Any idea what kind of format they are, and where it might be documented? Unfortunately, I don't know which tool was used to make the backup. Torfinn (talk) 11:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC)