Talk:ND-06.015: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Discussion of styles) |
(the pre tag and CSS?) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have left two different styles for TOC. Which should we use? I think the preformatted has a better look and the numbering scheme is better as the capters in the manuals are numbered in that way. [[User:Gandalf|Gandalf]] 00:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC) | I have left two different styles for TOC. Which should we use? I think the preformatted has a better look and the numbering scheme is better as the capters in the manuals are numbered in that way. [[User:Gandalf|Gandalf]] 00:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I think a (over) usage of "pre" is bad, since you can't do links or templates within. On the other hand I agree that it looks good. One idea is to remove the CSS stuff from the "pre" tag and use the [[:Template:DocDescr]] for graphical layout. HTML in the documents is something we should avoid. [[User:Mike|Mike]] 14:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:07, 28 October 2008
I have left two different styles for TOC. Which should we use? I think the preformatted has a better look and the numbering scheme is better as the capters in the manuals are numbered in that way. Gandalf 00:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think a (over) usage of "pre" is bad, since you can't do links or templates within. On the other hand I agree that it looks good. One idea is to remove the CSS stuff from the "pre" tag and use the Template:DocDescr for graphical layout. HTML in the documents is something we should avoid. Mike 14:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)