User talk:Gandalf: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Re. Butterfly docu) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I was just reading through it. It's got quite a bit of interesting information, although maybe not as much hardware info as one could wish. Too bad I didn't get hold of one of those Butterflys back when they existed, it would have been nice to have access to an actual ND-100 that way :-) | I was just reading through it. It's got quite a bit of interesting information, although maybe not as much hardware info as one could wish. Too bad I didn't get hold of one of those Butterflys back when they existed, it would have been nice to have access to an actual ND-100 that way :-) | ||
-- [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 16:51, 18 May 2011 (CEST) | -- [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 16:51, 18 May 2011 (CEST) | ||
:Unfortunately it seems it's not 100% complete.. Appendix A is lacking 8 pages, the schematics of it. Has listings of the PAL's though. | |||
:But agree otherwise, would be a fun way of playing around with one. :) [[User:Roger|Roger]] 19:13, 18 May 2011 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:13, 18 May 2011
Re. 'Hardware information about OWS, also known as the butterfly', maybe this doc will do? [1] (ND-06.025.3 EN Apr. 1987 Butterfly-110, Technical Reference Manual) I was just reading through it. It's got quite a bit of interesting information, although maybe not as much hardware info as one could wish. Too bad I didn't get hold of one of those Butterflys back when they existed, it would have been nice to have access to an actual ND-100 that way :-) -- TArntsen 16:51, 18 May 2011 (CEST)
- Unfortunately it seems it's not 100% complete.. Appendix A is lacking 8 pages, the schematics of it. Has listings of the PAL's though.
- But agree otherwise, would be a fun way of playing around with one. :) Roger 19:13, 18 May 2011 (CEST)