Talk:Documentation list-Software: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Q about manuals w/different numbering schemes) |
(Answer: Group them or two separate sections) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
the two versions have some important differences that it would be worth | the two versions have some important differences that it would be worth | ||
mentioning in the write-up. Thoughts? [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 09:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | mentioning in the write-up. Thoughts? [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 09:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Hmm. Group them together describing both documents, with their differences or two separate sections, each describing the difference between each other. The documentations lists have been "designed" as the needs have increased. Maybe it's time to do some rework? /[[User:Mike|Mike]] 19:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:56, 22 September 2009
Describing manuals affected by the numbering change
I have a question about how to best write up a section for a currently missing document, ND Linker User Guide and Reference Manual, which changed its numbering scheme in the transition from .1 to .2 (or .2p, which is a prelim version that I have). I.e. from 60.289.1 to 860289.2p. It wouldn't be good to have two different sections I think, even if one is just referring to the other - particularly for this document, because the two versions have some important differences that it would be worth mentioning in the write-up. Thoughts? TArntsen 09:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm. Group them together describing both documents, with their differences or two separate sections, each describing the difference between each other. The documentations lists have been "designed" as the needs have increased. Maybe it's time to do some rework? /Mike 19:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)