Talk:SPRINT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→ND product(s) section: new section) |
(A small reply.) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The "ND product(s)" section is a way to link programs back to their ND product number, so people can locate install images (if any exists). Do you think this is a good way to do it? --[[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo|talk]]) 10:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC) | The "ND product(s)" section is a way to link programs back to their ND product number, so people can locate install images (if any exists). Do you think this is a good way to do it? --[[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo|talk]]) 10:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
:I'm ok with it. I wonder though if we should invent a new category for the product number pages - 'ND product description' or some such, instead of lumping them together with the 'named software' in the Norsk Data Software category. --[[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen|talk]]) 02:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
:: that sounds like a good idea. Perhaps 'ND product description' should be a subcategory in 'Norsk Data documentation'? For those pages where we have (links to) software images we could add another category, 'ND software image' or something like that, which could be a subcategory of Norsk Data Software. --[[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo|talk]]) 09:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
:: another thought - if we create product categories (ND-211056 for SPRINT), we can remove the "product number" pages. The only thing missing then would be versions that are not described on NDwiki yet. I have changed the SPRINT page and added necessary categories. What thinks? --[[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo|talk]]) 10:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
::: Yes.. insofar as the current product number pages (the ones without letters/versions) are afaics basically a duplicate of the category number. --[[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen|talk]]) 10:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
:When we started this wiki we only had 20-30 floppys. Today we have issues to finding images from too much data. What a development! I think it's great you are discussing how to best form the software side of the wiki. Today I have about five banana boxes full of floppies that I will go through when time permits. I will let you two go on and form a working system. In the meantime I'm working on a new library layout. --[[User:Gandalf|Gandalf]] ([[User talk:Gandalf|talk]]) 21:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:08, 11 October 2016
ND product(s) section
The "ND product(s)" section is a way to link programs back to their ND product number, so people can locate install images (if any exists). Do you think this is a good way to do it? --Torfinn (talk) 10:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- I'm ok with it. I wonder though if we should invent a new category for the product number pages - 'ND product description' or some such, instead of lumping them together with the 'named software' in the Norsk Data Software category. --TArntsen (talk) 02:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- that sounds like a good idea. Perhaps 'ND product description' should be a subcategory in 'Norsk Data documentation'? For those pages where we have (links to) software images we could add another category, 'ND software image' or something like that, which could be a subcategory of Norsk Data Software. --Torfinn (talk) 09:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- another thought - if we create product categories (ND-211056 for SPRINT), we can remove the "product number" pages. The only thing missing then would be versions that are not described on NDwiki yet. I have changed the SPRINT page and added necessary categories. What thinks? --Torfinn (talk) 10:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- When we started this wiki we only had 20-30 floppys. Today we have issues to finding images from too much data. What a development! I think it's great you are discussing how to best form the software side of the wiki. Today I have about five banana boxes full of floppies that I will go through when time permits. I will let you two go on and form a working system. In the meantime I'm working on a new library layout. --Gandalf (talk) 21:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC)