Talk:ADD: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Q/O status flags <->) |
(Update to status bits discussion) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I noticed that O and Q are mixed here -- Q is the dynamic overflow flag, O is the static overflow flag (ND-06.026.1 p26). It seems to be the wrong way around some other places too. BTW I was almost starting to make a page for [[dynamic overflow indicator]] and the other one, but should we have a single page explaining the status flags instead? [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 11:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | I noticed that O and Q are mixed here -- Q is the dynamic overflow flag, O is the static overflow flag (ND-06.026.1 p26). It seems to be the wrong way around some other places too. BTW I was almost starting to make a page for [[dynamic overflow indicator]] and the other one, but should we have a single page explaining the status flags instead? [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 11:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Good that you found the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /[[User:Mike|Mike]] 15:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
::{{done}} I have updated the pages and switched O and Q. It seems to been a copy and paste error. /[[User:Mike|Mike]] 17:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I have made a try at the single status flag page, and one redirect (so far). It could need some major reworking. But I'm unable to do the kind of graphics found in e.g.the [[ND-100_Registers]] page. --[[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 14:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:05, 31 July 2010
I noticed that O and Q are mixed here -- Q is the dynamic overflow flag, O is the static overflow flag (ND-06.026.1 p26). It seems to be the wrong way around some other places too. BTW I was almost starting to make a page for dynamic overflow indicator and the other one, but should we have a single page explaining the status flags instead? TArntsen 11:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Good that you found the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /Mike 15:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
I have updated the pages and switched O and Q. It seems to been a copy and paste error. /Mike 17:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have made a try at the single status flag page, and one redirect (so far). It could need some major reworking. But I'm unable to do the kind of graphics found in e.g.the ND-100_Registers page. --TArntsen 14:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
