Talk:ND-GAMES: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Interesting directory size: new section) |
(Reply and tip about the pictures) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
711 pages - I haven't seen that before. I wonder if is caused by a bad image, or something else? [[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo|talk]]) 20:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC) | 711 pages - I haven't seen that before. I wonder if is caused by a bad image, or something else? [[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo|talk]]) 20:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
:I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.--[[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen|talk]]) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
:: I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. [[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo|talk]]) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
::: Yes, I also concluded that the single-sided images are ok. -- [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen|talk]]) 13:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
:Added some pictures of the PD for Games, don't know if it will tell you something more but I did it just for fun. ;-) I'll scan and add the PD later, the disk is probably in the house at the moment. --[[User:Gandalf|Gandalf]] ([[User talk:Gandalf|talk]]) 12:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:01, 16 April 2019
Interesting directory size
711 pages - I haven't seen that before. I wonder if is caused by a bad image, or something else? Torfinn (talk) 20:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.--TArntsen (talk) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. Torfinn (talk) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Added some pictures of the PD for Games, don't know if it will tell you something more but I did it just for fun. ;-) I'll scan and add the PD later, the disk is probably in the house at the moment. --Gandalf (talk) 12:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)