Talk:ND-06.015: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Discussion of styles) |
(Good name) |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have left two different styles for TOC. Which should we use? I think the preformatted has a better look and the numbering scheme is better as the capters in the manuals are numbered in that way. [[User:Gandalf|Gandalf]] 00:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC) | I have left two different styles for TOC. Which should we use? I think the preformatted has a better look and the numbering scheme is better as the capters in the manuals are numbered in that way. [[User:Gandalf|Gandalf]] 00:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I think a (over) usage of "pre" is bad, since you can't do links or templates within. On the other hand I agree that it looks good. One idea is to remove the CSS stuff from the "pre" tag and use the [[:Template:DocDescr]] for graphical layout. HTML in the documents is something we should avoid. [[User:Mike|Mike]] 14:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I agree that the biggest drawback is no links and other stuff when you use "pre" but I haven't managed to find a good enough alternative yet. I have tried the [[:Template:DocDescr]] but I keep coming back to the same problem, unreadable bullet lists or using "pre" inside the template. Usage of "pre" is Q&D (tm) and the style gives a feeling for how the manuals are written too. I try to avoid it as much as possible but I have spent hours on formatting text without accomplish anything. Mike, you are the guru, show us how it should be done by formatting a third copy of the index the right way and then we could compare and vote.[[User:Gandalf|Gandalf]] 17:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::I don't have any good solution for the moment, but I'll think something out. [[User:Mike|Mike]] 23:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
I don't think text should be formatted by hand, it comes from the wysiwyg world. All formatting in my view | |||
should be done through templates of some form. [[User:Roger|Roger]] 10:32, 29 October 2008 (WDT) | |||
:Since none have come up with a better solution I decided to go with the "pre" style and get the data up. I have checked wikipedia and "pre" isn't that rare, especially in code and algorithms. [[User:Gandalf|Gandalf]] 10:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I made two templates, <nowiki>{{DocStart}} and {{DocEnd}}</nowiki>, to use instead of the <nowiki><pre></nowiki>-tag. Now we can do linking in the text. Is DocStart/DocEnd good describing names? If not, let's change them. [[User:Mike|Mike]] 13:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Great! The [[User:Mike|guru]] has spoken! I have spent hours trying to accomplish that effect and all I got was headache. About the name... how about call it DocPreStart / DocPreEnd if we want more document templates? [[User:Gandalf|Gandalf]] 21:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::That was a good name! They are now renamed. As I was deleting files I had made by mistake, I found a red link ([[:NDWiki:Policy]]) that's not red anymore. :-) [[User:Mike|Mike]] 00:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:28, 6 November 2008
I have left two different styles for TOC. Which should we use? I think the preformatted has a better look and the numbering scheme is better as the capters in the manuals are numbered in that way. Gandalf 00:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think a (over) usage of "pre" is bad, since you can't do links or templates within. On the other hand I agree that it looks good. One idea is to remove the CSS stuff from the "pre" tag and use the Template:DocDescr for graphical layout. HTML in the documents is something we should avoid. Mike 14:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that the biggest drawback is no links and other stuff when you use "pre" but I haven't managed to find a good enough alternative yet. I have tried the Template:DocDescr but I keep coming back to the same problem, unreadable bullet lists or using "pre" inside the template. Usage of "pre" is Q&D (tm) and the style gives a feeling for how the manuals are written too. I try to avoid it as much as possible but I have spent hours on formatting text without accomplish anything. Mike, you are the guru, show us how it should be done by formatting a third copy of the index the right way and then we could compare and vote.Gandalf 17:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- I don't have any good solution for the moment, but I'll think something out. Mike 23:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't think text should be formatted by hand, it comes from the wysiwyg world. All formatting in my view should be done through templates of some form. Roger 10:32, 29 October 2008 (WDT)
- Since none have come up with a better solution I decided to go with the "pre" style and get the data up. I have checked wikipedia and "pre" isn't that rare, especially in code and algorithms. Gandalf 10:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- I made two templates, {{DocStart}} and {{DocEnd}}, to use instead of the <pre>-tag. Now we can do linking in the text. Is DocStart/DocEnd good describing names? If not, let's change them. Mike 13:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Great! The guru has spoken! I have spent hours trying to accomplish that effect and all I got was headache. About the name... how about call it DocPreStart / DocPreEnd if we want more document templates? Gandalf 21:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- That was a good name! They are now renamed. As I was deleting files I had made by mistake, I found a red link (NDWiki:Policy) that's not red anymore. :-) Mike 00:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Great! The guru has spoken! I have spent hours trying to accomplish that effect and all I got was headache. About the name... how about call it DocPreStart / DocPreEnd if we want more document templates? Gandalf 21:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- I made two templates, {{DocStart}} and {{DocEnd}}, to use instead of the <pre>-tag. Now we can do linking in the text. Is DocStart/DocEnd good describing names? If not, let's change them. Mike 13:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)