Talk:LOAD-MODE:MODE: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Warm start filename convention) |
m (Typo.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
APPEND-BATCH 1 LOAD-FILE:SYMB SYS-OUT-1 | APPEND-BATCH 1 LOAD-FILE:SYMB SYS-OUT-1 | ||
Does that mean that I could have called the file whatever I wanted? --[[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] 20:08, 20 December 2011 (CET) | Does that mean that I could have called the file whatever I wanted? --[[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] 20:08, 20 December 2011 (CET) | ||
:AFAIK it's just a convention. LOAD-MODE: | :AFAIK it's just a convention. LOAD-MODE:MODE is common but LOAD-MODE:SYMB was more used in the past. So if your system uses LOAD-FILE:SYMB it's fine, as you see it's in any case defined by you by @NEXT-INITIAL-COMMAND (the first command, set by @INITIAL-COMMAND, must be ENTER-DIRECTORY. Then add the rest with @N-I-C) --[[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 12:07, 21 December 2011 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:10, 21 December 2011
Name is a convention?
Is the name a convention? Instead of a hard rule? I have a machine where the initial commands specify LOAD-FILE:SYMB as the file to run. Like this:
@li-ini-com,, ENTER-DIRECTORY,,D-74MB-1,0 S-E-D 1 CONNECT SYS-OUT-1 105 R CLOSE 105 BATCH APPEND-BATCH 1 LOAD-FILE:SYMB SYS-OUT-1
Does that mean that I could have called the file whatever I wanted? --Torfinn 20:08, 20 December 2011 (CET)
- AFAIK it's just a convention. LOAD-MODE:MODE is common but LOAD-MODE:SYMB was more used in the past. So if your system uses LOAD-FILE:SYMB it's fine, as you see it's in any case defined by you by @NEXT-INITIAL-COMMAND (the first command, set by @INITIAL-COMMAND, must be ENTER-DIRECTORY. Then add the rest with @N-I-C) --TArntsen 12:07, 21 December 2011 (CET)