Talk:ADD - Revision history

TArntsen: Update to status bits discussion

2010-07-31T14:05:45Z

Update to status bits discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 31 July 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Good that you found the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 15:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)		:Good that you found the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 15:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
	::{{done}} I have updated the pages and switched O and Q. It seems to been a copy and paste error. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 17:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)		::{{done}} I have updated the pages and switched O and Q. It seems to been a copy and paste error. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 17:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
			:I have made a try at the single status flag page, and one redirect (so far). It could need some major reworking. But I'm unable to do the kind of graphics found in e.g.the [[ND-100_Registers]] page. --[[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] 14:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Mike: done

2009-08-09T17:26:24Z

done

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 9 August 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Good that you found the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 15:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)		:Good that you found the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 15:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
			::{{done}} I have updated the pages and switched O and Q. It seems to been a copy and paste error. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 17:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Mike: typo fix

2009-08-09T15:48:05Z

typo fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 9 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I noticed that O and Q are mixed here -- Q is the dynamic overflow flag, O is the static overflow flag (ND-06.026.1 p26). It seems to be the wrong way around some other places too. BTW I was almost starting to make a page for [[dynamic overflow indicator]] and the other one, but should we have a single page explaining the status flags instead? [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] 11:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)		I noticed that O and Q are mixed here -- Q is the dynamic overflow flag, O is the static overflow flag (ND-06.026.1 p26). It seems to be the wrong way around some other places too. BTW I was almost starting to make a page for [[dynamic overflow indicator]] and the other one, but should we have a single page explaining the status flags instead? [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] 11:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

	:Good that you ~~find~~ the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 15:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)		:Good that you found the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 15:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Mike: good. yes to "single status flag page"

2009-08-09T15:34:32Z

good. yes to "single status flag page"

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 9 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I noticed that O and Q are mixed here -- Q is the dynamic overflow flag, O is the static overflow flag (ND-06.026.1 p26). It seems to be the wrong way around some other places too. BTW I was almost starting to make a page for [[dynamic overflow indicator]] and the other one, but should we have a single page explaining the status flags instead? [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] 11:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)		I noticed that O and Q are mixed here -- Q is the dynamic overflow flag, O is the static overflow flag (ND-06.026.1 p26). It seems to be the wrong way around some other places too. BTW I was almost starting to make a page for [[dynamic overflow indicator]] and the other one, but should we have a single page explaining the status flags instead? [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] 11:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

			:Good that you find the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 15:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

TArntsen: Q/O status flags <->

2009-08-09T11:19:14Z

Q/O status flags <->

New page

I noticed that O and Q are mixed here -- Q is the dynamic overflow flag, O is the static overflow flag (ND-06.026.1 p26). It seems to be the wrong way around some other places too. BTW I was almost starting to make a page for [[dynamic overflow indicator]] and the other one, but should we have a single page explaining the status flags instead? [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 11:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 31 July 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Good that you found the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 15:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)		:Good that you found the missmatch. Yes, a single status flag page is perhaps the best way. And then we redict each flag to that page. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 15:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
	::{{done}} I have updated the pages and switched O and Q. It seems to been a copy and paste error. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 17:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)		::{{done}} I have updated the pages and switched O and Q. It seems to been a copy and paste error. /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 17:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
			:I have made a try at the single status flag page, and one redirect (so far). It could need some major reworking. But I'm unable to do the kind of graphics found in e.g.the [[ND-100_Registers]] page. --[[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] 14:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC)