Talk:ND-GAMES - Revision history

Gandalf: Reply and tip about the pictures

2019-04-16T12:01:29Z

Reply and tip about the pictures

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 16 April 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:: I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)		:: I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
	::: Yes, I also concluded that the single-sided images are ok. -- [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 13:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)		::: Yes, I also concluded that the single-sided images are ok. -- [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 13:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
			:Added some pictures of the PD for Games, don't know if it will tell you something more but I did it just for fun. ;-) I'll scan and add the PD later, the disk is probably in the house at the moment. --[[User:Gandalf\|Gandalf]] ([[User talk:Gandalf\|talk]]) 12:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

TArntsen: 0b images

2019-04-15T13:17:21Z

0b images

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 15 April 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.--[[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)		:I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.--[[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
	:: I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)		:: I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
			::: Yes, I also concluded that the single-sided images are ok. -- [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 13:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Tingo: /* Interesting directory size */ FluxEngine probably produces corrupt format 17b images

2019-04-15T13:13:42Z

Interesting directory size: FluxEngine probably produces corrupt format 17b images

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 15 April 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:
	711 pages - I haven't seen that before. I wonder if is caused by a bad image, or something else? [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 20:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)		711 pages - I haven't seen that before. I wonder if is caused by a bad image, or something else? [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 20:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
	:I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.--[[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)		:I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.--[[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
			:: I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

TArntsen: Sign

2019-04-15T10:34:06Z

Sign

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:34, 15 April 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:

	711 pages - I haven't seen that before. I wonder if is caused by a bad image, or something else? [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 20:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)		711 pages - I haven't seen that before. I wonder if is caused by a bad image, or something else? [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 20:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
	:I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.		:I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.--[[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

TArntsen: Possibly bad image(s)

2019-04-15T10:33:34Z

Possibly bad image(s)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:33, 15 April 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:

	711 pages - I haven't seen that before. I wonder if is caused by a bad image, or something else? [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 20:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)		711 pages - I haven't seen that before. I wonder if is caused by a bad image, or something else? [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 20:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
			:I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.

Tingo: /* Interesting directory size */ new section

2019-04-14T20:26:05Z

Interesting directory size: new section

New page

== Interesting directory size ==

711 pages - I haven't seen that before. I wonder if is caused by a bad image, or something else? [[User:Tingo|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo|talk]]) 20:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 16 April 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:: I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)		:: I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
	::: Yes, I also concluded that the single-sided images are ok. -- [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 13:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)		::: Yes, I also concluded that the single-sided images are ok. -- [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 13:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
			:Added some pictures of the PD for Games, don't know if it will tell you something more but I did it just for fun. ;-) I'll scan and add the PD later, the disk is probably in the house at the moment. --[[User:Gandalf\|Gandalf]] ([[User talk:Gandalf\|talk]]) 12:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 15 April 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.--[[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)		:I'm a little worried about the FluxEngine images. I see several :brf files with illegal brf codes and other errors, and strange sections in some of the :prog files. I'm not done analysing yet, one problem is that I don't have other copies of the same files that I am sure are the same. The nearest is the ditap:prog file (on one image) which has a zeroed first page, but that .prog file doesn't have a version ID so I'm not certain if it's the same as my ditap-1880d:prog. The code is exactly the same though.. (fortunately the start instruction is _after_ that first page). But that program actually works, so there's nothing conclusive yet.--[[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
	:: I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)		:: I think that the single-sided (format 0b) images probably are ok, I extracted files from one of those yesterday and they looked ok. However, the double-sided (format 17b) images are likely broken / corrupt, even if the directory is readable. The author of FluxEngine is going to get a logic analyzer so he can better understand why FluxEngine fails on HD floppies. It will take a few weeks before we know more. [[User:Tingo\|Torfinn]] ([[User talk:Tingo\|talk]]) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
			::: Yes, I also concluded that the single-sided images are ok. -- [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] ([[User talk:TArntsen\|talk]]) 13:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)